Precise answers for security, legal, and procurement review.
This section should reduce uncertainty, not add hype. It explains contracting context, jurisdiction, deployment boundaries, residency assumptions, control responsibilities, and the evidence available during vendor review.
What this trust story should do
Make the commercial and technical boundary legible before the buyer reaches legal review.
Explain what NeuroCluster controls, what the customer controls, and what depends on the selected deployment model.
Use evidence-backed language around jurisdiction, certification status, logging, incident handling, and portability.
What needs to be explicit
- Contracting entity and governing jurisdiction
- Which deployment models keep workloads in European infrastructure
- Data residency assumptions and any subprocessors involved
- How audit logs, approvals, and access controls are handled
- What support exists for compliance-sensitive deployments, without promising automatic compliance
Data Residency
See how residency, hosting location, and deployment boundaries are handled across different deployment models.
Explore jurisdiction detailsEU AI Act Readiness
Review the platform controls and delivery practices that support governance-sensitive AI deployments.
Read our compliance mappingProcurement Pack
Request the materials a buyer needs for vendor review, including security, legal, and architecture context.
Access evaluation resourcesCertifications & Audits
Check what is certified today, what is in progress, and what third-party evidence can be shared during evaluation.
View security posture